Fire sprinkler hose product advantages.
a) All stainless steel structure, reduce dust and pollutants, 100% anti-corrosion, ensure that water can be sprayed in emergency situations;
b) Good flexibility, which can effectively reduce the stress caused by the traditional hard pipe configuration error, thereby reducing the occurrence of cracks;
c) Simple installation, conservatively speaking, its assembly speed is 20 times that of traditional hard pipes! It is convenient for construction, saves time and cost, and replaces the complicated procedures of traditional construction such as measuring dimensions, cutting pipes, turning tooth connections, and locking, etc., and effectively reduces labor costs.
d) In case of reassembly or design changes, it can be easily and quickly displaced;
e) In the event of an earthquake, the sprinkler hose can be moved between the ceiling and the main pipe, avoiding the possibility of leakage and protecting its seal from damage.
Comparison of fire sprinkler hoses and traditional hard pipes
a) Compare from material and safety aspects:
Our products are all stainless steel, 100% anti-corrosion, to ensure that water can be sprayed in emergency situations; while the traditional hard pipe material is carbon steel galvanized, which is easy to corrode, because the galvanized layer on the surface is destroyed during the assembly and installation process, it is easily occur that the nozzle is rusted and plugged, and there may be no water in an emergency.
b) point of view from compare of the installation:
If it is S-type piping, we have 4 connectors, which is quick and easy to install, and the installation speed is 20 times that of traditional hard pipes! It takes less than 2 minutes to install a hose, and the height of the sprinkler head is easy to adjust; while the traditional hard pipe has 7 connectors, a worker can install no more than 10 a day at most, and it is complicated to measure the size, cut the pipe, turn teeth, take over, and lock. The installation is time-consuming, labor-intensive and costly.
c) Comparison from theoretical service life:
Our products are 120 years old, while traditional hard pipes are 60 years old.
d) From the perspective of vibration and bending:
Our hose is easy to absorb shock and bend easily, and has the effect of anti-vibration; while the rigid tube cannot absorb shock or bend due to its structure.
e) From an economic point of view:
Although the raw material cost of our products is slightly higher, the labor cost of installation is low, and the actual total cost is equivalent to that of the hard pipe, and it can be reused due to design changes; while the raw material cost of the hard pipe is low, but the labor cost and management cost of installation are high , design changes are not reusable.
